OpenAI wants nothing more than to move on from its CEO fiasco, but experts warn it faces a potential brain drain despite Sam Altmans return

Everyone from tech industry insiders to average bystanders marveled over the past week at how some of the brightest minds in Silicon Valley managed to briefly turn the worlds leading AI company into a laughing stock.

The drama that unfolded at OpenAI nearly a year to the day after the institute first captured peoples imagination with the release of ChatGPT is now overor at least pausedwith co-founder Sam Altman reinstated as CEO.

But experts now believe OpenAI crossed the Rubicon and there is no going back to the way things were, even if Altmans in-house rivals, among them Ilya Sutskever, wish for nothing more.

A brain drain now threatens to derail OpenAI, warns Georgetown University assistant professor Jason Schloetzer. As the erstwhile non-profit establishes itself first and foremost as a commercial entity under the de-facto control of Microsoft, its talent faces a fateful choice.

This could be the time you have to pick one side or the other, says Schloetzer, whose focuses are corporate governance and artificial intelligence. If you believe that having all of the OpenAI talent together in the same spot has tremendous value, then splitting them up reduces the pace of innovation.

Each employee will now have to question whether they support a lot of people getting richas Altman phrased it earlier this yearor OpenAIs original mission, which foresees ensuringeveryonebenefits from their work, and not just a few.

In a worst-case scenario, some of their best staff could follow the lead of Dario and Daniela Amodei, a brother and sister team at OpenAI who left in December 2020 to form their own AI startup, Anthropic.

Admirable that you can talk about it. Time to forgive, forget and move on for everyone. Now I wish the rest of the board would do that. WS the board meeting even legal? Noticed properly? https://t.co/KMwrugYUyl

Veteran venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has even wondered whether OpenAI will still exist.

OpenAI failure, if that is what ultimately happens, will scatter teams everywhere. The net result of that is more competition, hewarned.

The problem is the organization has been diminished after five dizzying days during which the board first sacked Altman withbarely any explanation, only to hire him back after an equally abrupt change of heart.

Sutskever, an OpenAI board director and its chief scientist, even turned on the very plotters he had first sided with and expresseddeep regretfor his actions, saying: I will do everything I can to reunite the company.

The drama became so gripping, it wascomparedtoGame of Thrones, the HBO fantasy drama best known for its perpetual palace intrigue and backstabbing. According to Vinod Khosla, the first VC investor to put money into OpenAI, the ensuing damagereflected poorlyon the entire field and set back the promise of artificial intelligence.

It was ultimately the threat of a brain drain that brought the coup to an end. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella shrewdly forced the boards hand by giving a blanket job guarantee to anyone who wanted to leave.

He wasnt the only one interested in poaching OpenAIs talent, either.

Salesforce founder and CEO Marc Benioff wasted no time in appealing personally to prospective deserters, making a standing offer to match the full cash and salary benefits of any OpenAI staffer on the spot.

Sent me your CV directly to CEO@salesforce.com, heoffered.

OpenAI couldnt afford that kind of exodus, bringing the brief revolt against Altman to a close.

Sutskever along with two independent directors, researchers Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley, were replaced with ex-Twitter chairman Bret Taylor and economist Lawrence Summers, both considered more investor-friendly.

OpenAI is nothing without its people

OpenAI is nothing without its people, chief technology officer Mira Murati acknowledged, echoing awidely held sentiment within the company.

With the situation now apparently resolved in the interests of OpenAIs shareholders, co-founder Greg Brockman, who had briefly resigned as chairman in protest of Altmans sacking, attempted to put on a brave face.

We are so back he tweeted, posting agroup photowith smiling staff members.

VC backer Khosla agreed, hoping to turn the page on the fiasco: Time to forgive, forget and move on everyone.

But the episode exposed an underlying rift that cannot be papered over with photos.

The stark choice employees now face between profits and purpose harkens back to OpenAIs very roots.

The company/nonprofit was founded in late 2015 as a counterweight to Google, with a goal to ensure advanced AI would not harm humanity or unduly concentrate power, as its foundingcharterstipulates.

Just prior to OpenAIs founding, Elon Muskone of OpenAIs original co-chairs, alongside Altmanbecame concerned, he says, by the cavalier attitude of Google co-founder Larry Page toward the dangers posed by AI, especially since the latter had just bought DeepMind.

Eventually, however, OpenAI needed to compromise on its ideals in order to scale its ambitions faster than the $1 billion in committed funds allowed. As a non-profit, it didnt have those kinds of resources, so it chose to fundraise from the private sector.

We are encouraged by the changes to the OpenAI board. We believe this is a first essential step on a path to more stable, well-informed, and effective governance. Sam, Greg, and I have talked and agreed they have a key role to play along with the OAI leadership team in ensuring https://t.co/djO6Fuz6t9

To remain true to its primary missiondeveloping AI that benefits all of humanitya solution was found in 2019 to create a hybrid governance structure. This would open it up to investors that would own equity in a new company called OpenAI LP, while ensuring board governance remained with the non-profit.

All investors to the new limited partnership were asked to sign the same obligation as employeesthat the founding charter always comes first, even at the expense of some or all of their financial stake.

But the private sector ultimately has a fiduciary duty to shareholders to protect their investment. So even if the OpenAI board still technically called the shots, the halcyon days of being unaccountable ended. The chaos surrounding Altmans brief sacking made that obvious.

There is no OpenAI without Microsoft leaning in in a deep way to partner with this company on their mission, Nadella warnedthis week.

2023 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice| Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information| Ad Choices
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
S&P Index data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.